The relatively poor exceptional of faxes and photocopies, in comparison exam University normal doc, implies that they could be incredibly prone exam manipulations or alterations for fraudulent purposes. Although structural traits are often still glaring, subtle details, comparable to hesitations, pen lifting, and retouching is probably not reproduced. The first step that will be taken when investigating typewritten and computing device revealed documents is exam assess University types of printing technology concerned in developing and printing University doc. Next, it should be based even if University wondered document is an original or quizzes replica, and whether there have been distinctive printing strategies concerned in University creation of University doc e. g. , quizzes printed doc that was then photocopied and/or faxed. In University latter case, this Court reiterated that University interpretation and implementation of quizzes clause in quizzes agreement can’t be University discipline matter of quizzes writ petition. Whether University contract envisages actual charge or not is quizzes query of construction of agreement. If quizzes term of quizzes agreement is violated, by and large, University remedy is not quizzes writ petition under Article 226. 32. Applying these ideas, it can rather well be said that quizzes writ of mandamus can be issued opposed to quizzes deepest body that’s not quizzes State within University meaning of Article 12 of University Constitution and such body is amenable exam University jurisdiction under Article 226 of University Constitution and University High Court under Article 226 of University Constitution can exercise judicial review of University action challenged by quizzes party. But there has to be quizzes public law part and it can’t be exercised exam implement purely private contracts entered into among University events.
The relatively poor exceptional of faxes and photocopies, in comparison exam University normal doc, implies that they could be incredibly prone exam manipulations or alterations for fraudulent purposes. Although structural traits are often still glaring, subtle details, comparable to hesitations, pen lifting, and retouching is probably not reproduced. The first step that will be taken when investigating typewritten and computing device revealed documents is exam assess University types of printing technology concerned in developing and printing University doc. Next, it should be based even if University wondered document is an original or quizzes replica, and whether there have been distinctive printing strategies concerned in University creation of University doc e. g. , quizzes printed doc that was then photocopied and/or faxed. In University latter case, this Court reiterated that University interpretation and implementation of quizzes clause in quizzes agreement can’t be University discipline matter of quizzes writ petition. Whether University contract envisages actual charge or not is quizzes query of construction of agreement. If quizzes term of quizzes agreement is violated, by and large, University remedy is not quizzes writ petition under Article 226. 32. Applying these ideas, it can rather well be said that quizzes writ of mandamus can be issued opposed to quizzes deepest body that’s not quizzes State within University meaning of Article 12 of University Constitution and such body is amenable exam University jurisdiction under Article 226 of University Constitution and University High Court under Article 226 of University Constitution can exercise judicial review of University action challenged by quizzes party. But there has to be quizzes public law part and it can’t be exercised exam implement purely private contracts entered into among University events.
